Sunday, January 31, 2010

(Some) New Drawings

As I related in an earlier post I am trying to develop a new, focused body of work. I feel like things have progressed to the point were I can post something about it - both the idea behind the work and some of the pieces I've managed to put together so far. These are a series of googlewhack drawings. What is a googlewhack? From wikipedia:

A googlewhack is a kind of a contest for finding a Google search query consisting of exactly two words without citation marks, that return exactly one hit, no less no more. A Googlewhack must consist of two actual words found in a dictionary. A Googlewhack is considered legitimate if both of the searched-for words appear as live links in in the blue bar above the Google results. Published googlewhacks are shortlived, since when published to a web site, the new number of hits will become at least two, one to the original hit found, and one to the publishing site.
As some of my former co-workers can attest there was a time several years ago that I became a bit obsessed with finding googlewhacks. What I ended up with was eyestrain, an expanded vocabulary and a list of several hundred successful googlewhacks - two-word pairings what were often strange, sometimes nonsensical, occasionally naughty, and usually just downright weird. The exercise of finding valid googlewhacks has become increasingly more difficult in recent years - keep in mind that the world wide web was a much smaller place just a few years ago (especially in the pre-blog era) and our vocabulary certainly hasn't expanded at the same rate as the internet. Eventually the list got filed away and I moved on to other distractions.

Recently I got to thinking about the list and decided that it might be fun to do a series of text-based drawings using the googlewhacks as the focal point. I'd already settled on both the materials (crayon and vellum) and process (cut & paste, draw, repeat) based on other recent work I'd done.

Anyway, what follows is a sample. I think I was still trying to find my way around in the first two drawings - the process and format seems to be more settled (in a good way) in the last three works:

eggnog lotharios. 2009.
crayon and enamel on vellum. 13-1/4 x 12 in.

zombi dovetails. 2009.
crayon and enamel on vellum. 21 x 16-1/2 in.

beatified oolong. 2010.
crayon and enamel on vellum. 31 x 29-1/2 in.

dharmic ravioli. 2010.
crayon and enamel on vellum. 27 x 22 in.

incurably longshanks. 2010.
crayon and enamel on vellum. 18 x 36 in.

So, what are they about? Well, I think they're partly about the ephemeral, fluid nature of language. I'm also seeing them as verbal follies - I hope the drawings read (both literally and visually) as something both monumental and ridiculous.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Revelation 178


revelation (strata)

Revelation 177


revelation (strata)

Revelation 176


revelation (strata)

Revelation 175


revelation (strata)

Revelation 174


revelation (strata)

Revelation 173


revelation (strata)

Revelation 172


revelation (strata)

Revelation 171


revelation (strata)

Revelation 170


revelation (strata)

Revelation 169


revelation (strata)

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Revelation 168


revelation (strata)

Revelation 167


revelation (strata)

Monday, January 18, 2010

Revelation 166


revelation (strata)

Revelation 165


revelation (strata)

Revelation 164


revelation (strata)

Revelation 163


revelation (strata)

Revelation 162


revelation (strata)

Revelation 160


revelation (strata)

Revelation 161


revelation (strata)

Revelation 159


revelation (strata)

Revelation 158


revelation (strata)

Revelation 157


revelation (strata)

Revelation 156


revelation (strata)